🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has announced it is pursuing damages amounting to $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This legal step represents a clear warning by the Kremlin regarding proposals to utilize frozen Russian sovereign assets to support Ukraine.

The Financial Lawsuit

According to accounts in Russian news outlets, the monetary authority initiated a claim last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This figure corresponds to the stated $230 billion claim.

European Union officials are set to determine in the coming days on a proposal to leverage around €210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. This scheme entails providing Ukraine with a large loan to fund its military and financial stability.

The vast majority of these funds, amounting to €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution serves as the main custodian for the Kremlin's immobilised financial reserves.

Dispute on Ownership

European Union authorities have argued that their proposal is on solid legal ground. Their position is based on the fact that ownership of the state assets still belongs to Russia, even though it was frozen in European jurisdictions following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has called any utilization of the funds as theft. Authorities have threatened reciprocal measures, such as seizing European corporate assets within Russia.

Kirill Dmitriev, a figure who has assumed a key role in peace negotiations, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and regain its funds. He warned that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.

Geopolitical Maneuvering

With statements interpreted as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, the official described the assets plan as "a severe attack on the right to ownership and the global financial system created by the United States."

The clearing house declined to provide a statement on the new lawsuit. The institution has in the past stated it is facing over 100 lawsuits in Russian courts.

Enforcement Challenges

While courts in EU countries are not expected to recognize judgments from Russian courts, experts expect Moscow to seek implementation in countries with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia could try to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic nations, provided that such assets can be located," stated a lawyer from an NSP law firm.

European Safeguards

European authorities said they are developing measures to deter other countries from assisting any Russian lawsuits against European companies. Additionally, they are designing protections to protect EU countries with assets in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

According to the complex scheme, the EU would provide an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds earned from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the principal funds would stay unaffected.

Kyiv would only be obligated to repay the money in the event that Russia agreed to pay reparations for the immense damage inflicted during the nearly four-year war.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an different method for financing Ukraine. This involves joint EU borrowing to secure a loan, using unallocated funds within the European budget.

Such a proposal, nevertheless, requires unanimity among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its objection.

Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, described the reparations loan as "the strongest option" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian frozen assets, which means it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is also significant," she remarked. "Furthermore, it sends a clear signal that if you cause all this destruction to another country, you must pay for the reparations."